Cita Iniciado por Hyeronimus Ver mensaje
There are no doubt influences as far as style and language. That's normal and understandable. But the article is the typical modernistic garbage that tries to interpret the Scriptures from a human standpoint and debunk the Word of God. There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian thought. Neither Judaism nor Christianism are philosophies, so the word "thought" is out of place. The author also confounds the deuterocanonical books with the Apocrypha (a typical Protestant mistake - they throw them all together).
Lacking divine cognition how is a human to interpret something except from the standpoint of the purely human? Given that the Holy Writings are written for a human audience, in various human languages (and not, say, some angelic or primeval language like the so-called Enochian), the idea that humans wouldn't attempt to understand them is strange.