As compared to the gnostic ruminations of the former follower of Mani the Zoroastrian heretic? That'd be Augustine, spiritual forebear of the arch-depressive Calvin.Do you really think that Augustine took nothing of gnosticism with him to Christianity, such as the idea of the dualism of matter and spirit, the corruption of matter, etc.? If this is so then I suppose the Stoic and Platonic leanings of Justin or the similarities between Pelagianism and certain aspects of druidry are purely coincidental. Pelagius was only anathematized because his teachings of human nature, popularized by Colestius, offended Augustine and his papal sponsor Innocent. Zosimus later declared Pelagius to be orthodox, later changing his mind and re-declaring Pelagius to be a heretic (because Augustine, Jermone, etc. were raising a fuss).
http://www.believers-dilemma.org/pub...yword/Pelagius
A few months later Augustine succeeded in having Pelagius brought to trial before 14 Eastern Bishops who carefully studied the allegedly heretical writings but found Pelagius orthodox on every point. They gave him a full acquittal. Once again, respected men who actually investigated Pelagius found nothing heretical in his beliefs. Augustine and his allies were outraged. They accused the Eastern Bishops of being duped. How? The 14 Eastern Bishops spoke only Greek and Augustine spoke only Latin, so the Bishops may not have fully understood the written accusations he had sent the court. Pelagius was fluent in both languages. Augustine claimed Pelagius was able to misinterpret his own Latin writings to conceal his heresies from the Greeks.
Marcadores