Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret.

**Annuit Coeptis** · 16/12/2013

A good video about the historical threat of Islam.

**tintaverde** · 16/12/2013

He starts, in the minute 8:30, talking about the difference between "classical christianity" and "bloody christianity" of today, difference promoted by the invasion of the muslims. And in minute 10:00 talks about the "dark ages". This men has no credibility. He tells the same lies, but with a "classical" (scientific, primarily) face.

En el minuto 8:30 comienza con las mentiras de siempre. La supuesta diferencia entre el cristianismo clásico y el cristianismo malo que se originó en la edad media, a causa segun él de los moros. Cuando fueron ellos los que Dios utilizó para probar nuestro temple y fortalecer nuestra fe, cosa que conseguimos. En el minuto 10:00 habla sobre la época oscura medieval. Las mismas mentiras de siempre pero con el envoltorio del conocimiento clásico y científico. Se nota que este señor no es Católico, debe ser protestante ( la pajarita canta mucho).

Aun así lo que cuenta es interesante. Recalca que lo que mueve a los moros no es sólo una relación religiosa sino tambien de sangre.

**Annuit Coeptis** · 21/12/2013

Iniciado por tintaverde

....

The blood of the martyrs, faithful, etc. is the seed of the Faith.

A scientist exposing/explaining why jihadism is a perpetual menace to Christendom is... what exactly? Would you prefer an African witch-doctor instead? A mullah?

**tintaverde** · 21/12/2013

Iniciado por Annuit Coeptis

Would you prefer an African witch-doctor instead? A mullah?

No. I prefer a historician who talks about the "middle ages" without saying that were dark.

By the way I think that is an interesting video.

**Annuit Coeptis** · 23/12/2013

Iniciado por tintaverde

No. I prefer a historician who talks about the "middle ages" without saying that were dark.

By the way I think that is an interesting video.

I think it has been properly shown that the dark ages weren't so dark except in the minds of liberals. The narrator of the video has the secular view- to no fault of his own since the secularist view of history is the accepted defaul- that classical civilization was superior to feudal civilization that followed it, i.e. "the dark ages," and that there was no continuity between latter Roman civilization and the time frame of the feudal lords in Western Europe. The man has secular (scientific) view of history- but he deviates from the usual "barbarians destroyed the Roman Empire" and points the finger at the Muslims (honestly- how many will do this when the Muslims are typically portrayed as cultured and civilized as compared to the scruffy Christian barbarians of Western Europe?).